Below is a string of emails that definitely outlines the type of communication Zappos.com has with their marketing group... Your comment about 'just because we buy an ad somewhere doesn't mean consumers will pay attention to it' is true, however how do you treat customer's who are paying attention to your ads but your ads are not living up to the expectation... Read below for my original email to your 'Customer Loyalty Team', their response, and my rebuttal. I am not impressed to say the least.
Uh, no offense, but I think you are just jumping the gun here. Yeah, it sucks that you found what was probably an out-of-date advertisement on ebay. But it seems you overreacted, which is apparent in your convoluted email/letter about how "unethical" Zappos is.
To be frank, when I read your post (from bottom up), I too assumed that some random seller on eBay had posted some incorrect information. It probably would have helped the customer service rep greatly if you had described what you had seen (i.e., a sponsored ad). You probably would have gotten a more "acceptable" answer. How could the rep have known that it was an advertisement you were looking at? Given what was written in your initial email, the rep's response was more than adequate.
So to have jumped all over the rep like that, when you didn't provide enough information in the first place, is a bit unfair.
Please sign in using your Zappos.com account to leave a comment.
Hm. This is a nitpick, but that was definitely not a moonwalk. Had it been a properly executed moonwalk, I like to think that I would have noticed.